ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
LC-MS/MS Method for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Abiraterone, Darolutamide, Apalutamide, Enzalutamide, and Metabolites in Prostate Cancer Patients.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate measurement of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and their active metabolites is essential for pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients with prostate cancer (PC). However, their simultaneous determination in human plasma is analytically challenging because of the wide concentration ranges. This study aimed to develop and validate a sensitive and robust LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of abiraterone, Δ4-abiraterone, enzalutamide, N-desmethyl enzalutamide, darolutamide, keto-darolutamide, apalutamide, and N-desmethyl apalutamide in human plasma. Sample preparation was performed by protein precipitation, followed by chromatographic separation and detection using multiple reaction monitoring with isotopically labeled internal standards (total run time 6.5 min). The method was validated in accordance with regulatory guidelines by assessing selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, recovery, matrix effects, and stability. The assay demonstrated good linearity (≥0.997) across clinically relevant concentration ranges, with lower limits of quantification between 0.1 and 40 ng/mL, depending on the analyte. Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy were within acceptable limits, and recovery and matrix effects were consistent across different plasma matrices. Stability experiments conducted in plasma and whole blood provided practical guidance for sample handling. The method was successfully applied to 79 plasma samples from 61 patients with metastatic PC. Measured concentrations were generally consistent with published pharmacokinetic data, while unexpectedly high ABI levels were observed. Sample collection occurred between 1 and 28 h after the last drug intake, enabling assessment of the analytical method across the entire pharmacokinetic profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.