ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Enhancing Type 1 Diabetes Polygenic Risk Prediction Through Neural Networks and Entropy-Derived Insights.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease with a strong genetic component (~70% heritability). Early identification of individuals at risk is crucial for early intervention or risk assessment. Although polygenic risk scores (PRS) have shown promise in risk assessment, most current approaches remain constrained by linear assumptions and limited generalizability. We aimed to develop a neural network-driven classifier using T1D-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In addition, we explored the inclusion of an entropy-derived feature as a complementary variable, representing the degree of genetic variability within an individual's genotype profile across the 67 T1D-associated SNPs, to evaluate its potential additive contribution to the model performance. We analyzed genotype data from 11,909 individuals in the UK BioBank (546 T1D cases and 11,363 controls). Sixty-seven well-known SNPs associated with T1D were utilized as inputs to the model, using two distinct allele-encoding strategies. A feed-forward neural network was evaluated under varying case-control ratios through five-fold cross-validation. Performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on a held-out test set and on an external European cohort as a validation cohort. Across five-fold cross-validation, the best configuration achieved a median AUC of 0.903. On the held-out UK Biobank test set, the model generalized well, with an AUC of 0.8889 (95% CI: 0.8516-0.9262). A probability-based risk framework, constructed using five risk groups ("very low", "low", "intermediate", "high", and "very high" risk), yielded a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.9% for the "very low" risk group and a Positive Predicted Value (PPV) of 61.9% with a specificity of 97.3% for the "very high" risk group, assuming a 10% T1D prevalence. External validation in the German Diabetes Study reproduced clear case-control separation; for individuals with recent onset diabetes and glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA+) vs. controls, specificity reached 91.9% in the "high" risk group (PPV of 94.3%) and 97.6% in the "very high" risk group (PPV of 95.7%). The proposed neural network reliably predicts T1D genetic risk using a compact SNP panel of 67 SNPs and maintains accuracy in both internal and external European cohorts. Its probabilistic output enables clinically interpretable risk thresholds, while entropy features contributed modestly to performance. These results demonstrate that a neural network-based approach achieves discriminative performance that is comparable to established T1D genetic risk models, while offering flexible probability-based risk stratification and architectural extensibility for future integration of additional features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.