Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41976883›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

A Review of Finite Element Analysis in Spine Surgery Decision-Making.

Elizabeth Beaulieu, Jaden Wise, Isabella Merem, Zachary Comella, Rosstin Afsahi, Joshua Roemer, Maohua Lin, Richard Sharp, Talha S Cheema, Frank D Vrionis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elizabeth BeaulieuCollege of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
Jaden WiseCollege of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
Isabella MeremCollege of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-2110-1499
Zachary ComellaCollege of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-6946-0603
Rosstin AfsahiCollege of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8264-9852
Joshua RoemerCollege of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-8966-5979
Maohua LinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9460-2111
Richard SharpDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
Talha S CheemaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Marcus Neuroscience Institute, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, FL 33486, USA.
Frank D VrionisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Marcus Neuroscience Institute, Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Boca Raton, FL 33486, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-0259-8618

Funding

Helene and Stephen Weicholz Foundation NAMarcus Neuroscience Institution C-24-335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finite element analysis is widely used to study spinal biomechanics and to compare surgical strategies under controlled loading conditions. By allowing variation in alignment, fixation, and implant design, these models provide insight into stress redistribution and motion changes that are difficult to isolate experimentally. This review examines spine surgery-focused finite element studies published between 2018 and 2024, with emphasis on interbody fusion techniques, adjacent segment mechanics, and implant-related stress behavior. Across lumbar fusion models, constructs incorporating anterior column support demonstrate lower posterior instrumentation stress than posterior-only approaches, with lateral lumbar interbody techniques showing reduced rod and screw stresses across multiple loading conditions compared with posterior lumbar interbody or posterolateral fusion constructs. In the cervical spine, comparisons of plated and zero-profile anterior cervical discectomy and fusion devices show smaller increases in adjacent-level motion and intradiscal pressure with zero-profile constructs, alongside higher localized stress at fixation interfaces. More recent studies apply finite element methods to implant optimization, alignment planning, and patient-specific modeling. Together, these findings suggest that finite element analysis is increasingly used to support surgical planning and implant design, with continued advances in validation and patient-specific simulation likely to strengthen its clinical relevance.

Indexed as

adjacent segment degenerationFEAfinite element analysisinterbody fusionpatient-specific modelingspinal implant designspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID41976883
PMCPMC13073806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.