ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Preoxygenation When Standard Approaches Fail: Phenotype-Based Strategies for High-Risk Emergent Intubations.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergent tracheal intubation in critically ill patients is a common, yet high-risk, intervention. It is frequently complicated by peri-intubation hypoxemia, hemodynamic instability, and metabolic derangements that increase the risk of arrhythmias, hypotension, cardiac arrest, and death. Because the highest-risk interval often occurs in the minutes surrounding induction, when apnea, derecruitment, and abrupt cardiopulmonary shifts converge, oxygenation failure frequently reflects a mismatch between preoxygenation strategy and the underlying physiology rather than inadequate oxygen delivery alone. This review proposes a phenotype-based approach to peri-intubation oxygenation and focuses on four high-risk phenotypes in whom standard preoxygenation strategies commonly fail: obesity, neuromuscular disease, right ventricular dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension, and post-operative respiratory failure with altered respiratory mechanics or airway anatomy. We summarize the key mechanisms that shorten safe apnea time, including reduced functional residual capacity, intrapulmonary shunt, elevated oxygen consumption, rapid derecruitment after induction, and impaired oxygenation-hemodynamics coupling. We then compare preoxygenation modalities as physiologic tools, including facemask oxygen, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), and controlled bag-mask ventilation (BMV), and integrate contemporary randomized trial evidence that informs bedside selection and combination of these approaches. Finally, we synthesize these concepts into a practical, physiology-informed framework to guide clinicians in choosing and troubleshooting preoxygenation strategies in high-risk patients undergoing emergent intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.