ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Precise Pressure Control for Screw Extrusion 3D Printing of PP-GF Composites Based on Inverse Model Feedforward and Variable Structure Feedback.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Addressing challenges such as the non-Newtonian fluid characteristics of melt, significant system hysteresis, and rheological thermal drift in large-scale glass fiber-reinforced polypropylene (PP-GF) screw-extrusion additive manufacturing (SEAM), this paper proposes a composite pressure control strategy based on inverse model feedforward and variable-structure feedback (VSFC-Smith). This strategy establishes a dynamic pressure benchmark through an inverse rheological model, utilizes a Smith predictor to compensate for time delay, and introduces dead-zone variable-structure feedback to smoothly suppress thermal drift. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared to traditional PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) controller, the VSFC-Smith strategy reduces the step pressure overshoot from 23.37% to 17.37%, decreases steady-state screw speed fluctuation by approximately 50%, and limits the error within ±0.04 MPa during complex trajectory tracking. In practical molding validation, this strategy effectively suppressed surface ripples, reducing the surface roughness (Sa) by 14.5% to 124.41 μm; simultaneously, the Z-directional interlayer tensile strength reached 12.63 MPa (a 22.5% improvement compared to open-loop control). This study successfully overcomes the limitations of traditional high-gain feedback, achieving synergistic optimization of the macroscopic morphology and microscopic mechanical properties of composite parts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.