ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Dispersion Mechanism of Conductive Phase Materials and Micro-Mechanical Properties of ERCC.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Temperature control and crack prevention are crucial for mass concrete structures in cold regions. Electrically conductive roller-compacted concrete (ERCC) provides a promising route to shift surface temperature regulation from passive protection to active control. To develop an ERCC material suitable for engineering applications, this study first established a quantitative relationship between interparticle interaction energy and particle spacing to elucidate the effect of carbon black (CB) dispersion and agglomeration on concrete performance. The dispersion quality of CB was then evaluated by sedimentation tests, UV absorbance, and resistivity measurements. The absorbance of CB suspensions containing PCE, SDS, and TA increased by 79.9%, 80.1%, and 100.4%, respectively, compared with the suspension without dispersant, and TA gave the lowest mortar resistivity. Mechanical tests and mesoscopic simulations showed that coarse aggregate volume fraction and CB dosage had stronger effects on the compressive strength and elastic modulus of ERCC than aggregate gradation and specimen size. After calibration using the ERCC-2-TA mixture, the average errors between simulation and experiment were 0.7% for compressive strength and 0.4% for elastic modulus. For engineering applications, the recommended ERCC parameters were a coarse aggregate volume fraction of 40%, a CB content of 4-5% and a water-to-binder ratio of 0.45-0.50 for roads, and a CB content of 8% with a water-to-binder ratio of 0.55 for dams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.