Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41976588›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Artificial Intelligence in Metal Additive Manufacturing: Applications in Design, Process Modeling, Monitoring, and Quality Optimization.

Juan Sustacha, Virginia Uralde, Álvaro Rodríguez-Díaz, Fernando Veiga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan SustachaDepartment of Engineering, Public University of Navarre, Campus of Arrosadía, 31006 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0553-7099
Virginia UraldeDepartment of Engineering, Public University of Navarre, Campus of Tudela, 31500 Tudela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4120-7038
Álvaro Rodríguez-DíazDepartment of Engineering, Public University of Navarre, Campus of Arrosadía, 31006 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0009-0007-9552-6011
Fernando VeigaDepartment of Engineering, Public University of Navarre, Campus of Arrosadía, 31006 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9311-8635

Funding

Euroregion Nouvelle-Aquitaine Euskadi Navarra through the "Euroregional Innovation" program MMAMMICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by 'ERDF A way of making Europe' PLEC2024-011165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal additive manufacturing (MAM) enables the production of complex, high-value components for sectors such as aerospace, energy, and biomedical engineering. However, its large-scale industrial adoption remains constrained by internal defects, residual stresses, distortions, microstructural variability, and the complexity of the coupled process-parameter space. This review examines how artificial intelligence (AI)-including machine learning, deep learning, and optimization algorithms-is being applied to address these challenges across the MAM workflow. A structured literature review was conducted covering studies published between 2015 and 2025, identified through searches in Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. The selected literature is analyzed according to key functional domains of metal additive manufacturing: design for additive manufacturing (DfAM), process modeling and simulation, in situ monitoring and control, and microstructure and property prediction. AI approaches are further categorized by learning paradigm, including supervised learning, deep learning, reinforcement learning, and hybrid physics-machine learning models. The review highlights recent advances in AI-assisted parameter optimization, defect detection, and digital-twin frameworks for process supervision. At the same time, it identifies persistent challenges, particularly the scarcity and heterogeneity of datasets, limited transferability across machines and materials, and the need for uncertainty-aware models capable of supporting validation and certification. Overall, the analysis indicates that the integration of multi-sensor monitoring with hybrid physics-informed AI models represents the most promising near-term pathway to improve process reliability, reduce trial-and-error experimentation, and accelerate industrial qualification in metal additive manufacturing.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdefect detectionDfAMdigital twinmachine learningmetal additive manufacturingphysics-informed modelingprocess monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41976588
PMCPMC13074266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.