ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence in Metal Additive Manufacturing: Applications in Design, Process Modeling, Monitoring, and Quality Optimization.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Metallic Orthopedic Implant Development: A Narrative Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metal additive manufacturing (MAM) enables the production of complex, high-value components for sectors such as aerospace, energy, and biomedical engineering. However, its large-scale industrial adoption remains constrained by internal defects, residual stresses, distortions, microstructural variability, and the complexity of the coupled process-parameter space. This review examines how artificial intelligence (AI)-including machine learning, deep learning, and optimization algorithms-is being applied to address these challenges across the MAM workflow. A structured literature review was conducted covering studies published between 2015 and 2025, identified through searches in Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. The selected literature is analyzed according to key functional domains of metal additive manufacturing: design for additive manufacturing (DfAM), process modeling and simulation, in situ monitoring and control, and microstructure and property prediction. AI approaches are further categorized by learning paradigm, including supervised learning, deep learning, reinforcement learning, and hybrid physics-machine learning models. The review highlights recent advances in AI-assisted parameter optimization, defect detection, and digital-twin frameworks for process supervision. At the same time, it identifies persistent challenges, particularly the scarcity and heterogeneity of datasets, limited transferability across machines and materials, and the need for uncertainty-aware models capable of supporting validation and certification. Overall, the analysis indicates that the integration of multi-sensor monitoring with hybrid physics-informed AI models represents the most promising near-term pathway to improve process reliability, reduce trial-and-error experimentation, and accelerate industrial qualification in metal additive manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.