Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41976566›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Optimisation of the WC-Co Composite Manufacturing Process Using Spark Plasma Sintering Technology with the DOE Methodology.

Robert Kruzel, Tomasz Dembiczak, Zbigniew Bałaga, Marcin Lis, Dariusz Kołacz, Joanna Wachowicz, Sylvia Kuśmierczak, Nataša Náprstková

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert KruzelFaculty of Civil Engineering, Czestochowa University of Technology, Akademicka Street 3, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8534-7286
Tomasz DembiczakFaculty of Science and Technology, Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa, Armii Krajowej Street 13/15, 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2751-3749
Zbigniew BałagaFaculty of Production Engineering and Materials Technology, Czestochowa University of Technology, Armii Krajowej Street 19, 42-201 Czestochowa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7004-7037
Marcin LisCentre of Powder and Composite Materials, Łukasiewicz Research Network-Institute of Non-Ferrous Metals, Sowińskiego 5 Street, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-6686
Dariusz KołaczCentre of Advanced Materials Technologies, Łukasiewicz Research Network-Institute of Non-Ferrous Metals, Sowińskiego 5 Street, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4086-3786
Joanna WachowiczInstitute of Wood Sciences and Furniture, Department of Mechanical Processing of Wood, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska Street 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7942-3959
Sylvia KuśmierczakFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Pasteurova Street 1, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5135-4170
Nataša NáprstkováFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Pasteurova Street 1, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4433-0581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The research conducted in this paper is a practical example of the Design of Experiments methodology. In accordance with the assumptions of the experimental design, the authors drew attention to the problem: how should the spark plasma sintering process be planned to obtain the maximum amount of information needed to optimise the consolidation of the WC-6Co composite at the lowest possible cost? The DOE methodology-a powerful technique for investigating new processes and gaining knowledge about existing ones in order to optimise them for high performance-was employed in the study. The aim of the research was to optimise the consolidation of the spark-plasma sintering process of the WC-6Co composite using the DoE (Design of Experiments) methodology. Four sintering factors were selected for the study: sintering temperature (factor A, 1300-1400 °C); heating rate (factor B, 100-300 °C/min); sintering time (factor C, 150-600 s); and pressure (factor D, 40-50 MPa). Each consolidation factor was designed to cover three levels. The L9 orthogonal array was used. It was found that sintering temperature and heating rate had the greatest impact on apparent density. To validate the statistical model, sintering tests were performed at a temperature of 1380 °C, a heating rate of 100 °C/min, a sintering time of 150 s and a pressing pressure of 45 MPa. Validation analysis of the statistical model demonstrated consistency with the experimental results. The WC-6Co composite achieved an apparent density of 14.85 g/cm

Indexed as

cemented carbidesdesign of experiment (DOE)spark plasma sintering (SPS)

Identifiers

PMID41976566
PMCPMC13073815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.