ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Optimisation of the WC-Co Composite Manufacturing Process Using Spark Plasma Sintering Technology with the DOE Methodology.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The research conducted in this paper is a practical example of the Design of Experiments methodology. In accordance with the assumptions of the experimental design, the authors drew attention to the problem: how should the spark plasma sintering process be planned to obtain the maximum amount of information needed to optimise the consolidation of the WC-6Co composite at the lowest possible cost? The DOE methodology-a powerful technique for investigating new processes and gaining knowledge about existing ones in order to optimise them for high performance-was employed in the study. The aim of the research was to optimise the consolidation of the spark-plasma sintering process of the WC-6Co composite using the DoE (Design of Experiments) methodology. Four sintering factors were selected for the study: sintering temperature (factor A, 1300-1400 °C); heating rate (factor B, 100-300 °C/min); sintering time (factor C, 150-600 s); and pressure (factor D, 40-50 MPa). Each consolidation factor was designed to cover three levels. The L9 orthogonal array was used. It was found that sintering temperature and heating rate had the greatest impact on apparent density. To validate the statistical model, sintering tests were performed at a temperature of 1380 °C, a heating rate of 100 °C/min, a sintering time of 150 s and a pressing pressure of 45 MPa. Validation analysis of the statistical model demonstrated consistency with the experimental results. The WC-6Co composite achieved an apparent density of 14.85 g/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.