Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41976518›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Perception and Adoption of Good Agricultural Practices Among Family Farmers Supplying Fruits and Vegetables to Brazil's School Feeding Program-A Mix-Method Study in the Federal District.

Isabela C C Alves, Hevellyn S Silvestre, Amanda B Costa, Matheus R Driessen, Neusa K F Mathias, Letícia P Souza, Sueny A Batista, Eleuza R Machado, Renata Puppin Zandonadi, Veronica C Ginani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isabela C C AlvesDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasília, P.O. Box 4569, Brasília 70904-970, DF, Brazil.
Hevellyn S SilvestreDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasília, P.O. Box 4569, Brasília 70904-970, DF, Brazil.
Amanda B CostaDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasília, P.O. Box 4569, Brasília 70904-970, DF, Brazil.
Matheus R DriessenDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasília, P.O. Box 4569, Brasília 70904-970, DF, Brazil.
Neusa K F MathiasDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasília, P.O. Box 4569, Brasília 70904-970, DF, Brazil.
Letícia P SouzaDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasília, P.O. Box 4569, Brasília 70904-970, DF, Brazil.
Sueny A BatistaFaculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Goiás, Rua 227, Quadra 68, nº30, Setor Leste Universitário, Goiânia 74605-080, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0244-5364
Eleuza R MachadoHospital Universitário de Brasília (HUB), Brazilian Company of Hospital Services (EBSERH), SGAN 605, Asa Norte, Brasília 70840-901, DF, Brazil.
Renata Puppin ZandonadiDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasília, P.O. Box 4569, Brasília 70904-970, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0370-3089
Veronica C GinaniDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasília, P.O. Box 4569, Brasília 70904-970, DF, Brazil.

Funding

Foundation for Research Support of the Federal District 03/2018 SCIENTIFIC, TECHNOLOGICAL AND INNOVATION RESEARCH - SPONTANEOUS DEMAND
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess food safety conditions among family farmers supplying the National School Feeding Program (PNAE) in the Federal District, Brazil. This exploratory mixed-methods study was subdivided into two main phases: (i) samples of fruits, vegetables, water, soil, and farmers' feces were analyzed microbiologically and/or parasitologically across nine properties; (ii) sociodemographic and Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) questionnaires were administered, followed by semi-structured interviews to evaluate their perceptions of food safety. Participants were males (100%), of mixed race (88.9%), aged 41-50 years (44.4%), with secondary education (33.3%), and an income between USD 1000 and USD 2000 (33.3%). Samples from food (n = 162), water (n = 18), soil (n = 90), and feces (n = 6) were analyzed. All fruit and vegetable samples, and 83.3% of water samples exceeded acceptable limits for at least one of the microorganisms analyzed. 86.7% of the soil samples showed high levels of contamination. Parasitic contamination was detected in 50.6% of the fruit and vegetable samples, in 63.3% of the soil samples, and in none of the water samples. Most farms used deep or artesian wells (77.7%) and non-connected septic pits (77.7%). Organic fertilization predominated (88.8%), with chemical fertilizers occasionally used (11.2%). Farmers demonstrated strong environmental awareness but limited technical knowledge of food safety. Results indicate persistent vulnerability despite ethical and ecological commitment. Continuous training and stronger public policies are essential to enhance GAP adherence, ensure food microbiological safety, and sustain PNAE objectives.

Indexed as

family farminggood agricultural practicespublic policyrural healthschool feeding

Identifiers

PMID41976518
PMCPMC13073351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.