ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
DOE-Based Optimization of Dietary Fiber Extraction Process and Bioactivity Evaluation of Plum (
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plum pomace (PP), a key by-product of plum juice processing, is a rich yet underutilized source of dietary fiber. However, its high-value exploitation is severely limited by the lack of efficient extraction and modification technologies. This study optimized the extraction of soluble dietary fiber (SDF) and insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) from plum pomace (PP) via Design of Experiments (DOE), and evaluated their modification effects. Alkaline extraction was screened as the optimal method for IDF, and orthogonal experiments determined the optimal conditions: solid-to-liquid ratio 1:20 g/mL, 14 g/L NaOH, 60 °C, and 80 min, achieving a high extraction yield of 62.18%. For SDF, enzymatic extraction was superior, and response surface methodology (RSM) optimized the process to a solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:15.5, 1.0% enzyme dosage, 61.5 °C, and 92 min, with a yield of 29.3%. Physical, chemical, and biological modifications all significantly enhanced SDF's water/oil-holding capacity, cholesterol/glucose adsorption capacity, and cation exchange capacity. Biologically modified SDF showed the most significant enhancement, with WHC of 5.58 ± 0.05 g/g, OHC of 4.38 g/g, CAC of 7.68 mg/g, and CEC of 3.28 mmol/g. These results provide technical support for the high-value utilization of PP and lay a foundation for its application in functional foods and nutraceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.