ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Development of a Risk Matrix for Assessing PFAS in Food Packaging.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The minimisation of substances of concern in packaging is a key objective of the European Union's Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), complementing existing legislation governing the safety of food contact materials. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) present particular challenges due to their persistence, chemical diversity, and documented use in certain food contact materials. Article 5 of the PPWR requires packaging to be designed and manufactured to minimise such substances throughout the life cycle. This study develops a structured, material-based PFAS risk matrix to support compliance screening for food packaging under Article 5. The approach combines scientific evidence on PFAS occurrence, functional applications, and analytical detection with material classification systems used in recyclability assessments. Packaging materials are categorised by their likelihood of PFAS relevance, enabling proportionate prioritisation of efforts. Application of the matrix shows that fibre-based materials with grease- or water-resistant treatments exhibit higher relevance than glass, untreated paper, or polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The framework also clarifies the role of total fluorine (TF) and extractable organic fluorine (EOF) as supportive, material-specific indicators rather than standalone compliance metrics. By integrating PFAS considerations into design, sourcing, and portfolio management, the framework promotes proactive chemical risk governance aligned with circular economy objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.