Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41976438›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Impact of Alternative Protein Sources on Gut Microbiota: Limitations of the Current Understanding.

Lara Costantini, Nicolò Merendino

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lara CostantiniDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences, Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9147-9755
Nicolò MerendinoDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences, Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5044-1398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the effects of carbohydrates and fibers on the gut microbiota are well established, the influence of proteins has only recently been explored. In addition, whereas the impacts of conventional protein sources remain partially defined, evidence is even more limited for alternative sources, such as insects, algae, and fungi. This commentary highlights the critical knowledge gaps in the context of the impact of alternative protein sources on gut microbiota, which need future investigation. This understanding becomes even more critical when considering that many of these sources are regarded as novel foods by large segments of the global population. Emerging findings suggest that differences in protein structure and digestibility may increase the protein content in the lumen, which in turn could enhance microbial protein fermentation and the production of poorly characterized metabolites. Moreover, the gut microbiota may be less adapted to metabolizing and managing such novel substrates if they were not previously part of the habitual diet. Therefore, well-designed clinical trials are urgently needed to understand the real potential effects of the alternative proteins on gut microbiota.

Indexed as

algaealternative proteinsfungiinsectsmicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID41976438
PMCPMC13073773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.