ReviewCancers2026
Using ctDNA to Inform Adjuvant Therapy for Urologic Malignancies.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decisions regarding the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in genitourinary (GU) malignancies-including bladder, kidney, and prostate cancers-are currently driven by clinicopathologic risk factors, which incompletely capture individual risk of residual disease. Consequently, patient selection for adjuvant treatment remains imprecise, leading to both overtreatment of cancers unlikely to recur and undertreatment of those with occult residual disease. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a minimally invasive liquid biopsy biomarker for minimal residual disease, has emerged as a promising tool to refine adjuvant treatment decision-making. Detection of ctDNA reflects persistent tumor-derived genomic material and often precedes radiographic recurrence, whereas ctDNA negativity is consistently associated with favorable oncologic outcomes. In this review, we summarize the evolving evidence supporting the use of ctDNA to guide adjuvant therapy decisions in bladder, kidney, and prostate cancers. This is not a comprehensive review on all of the potential applications of ctDNA in these malignancies. Rather, we aim to highlight disease-specific, adjuvant-guiding applications, including post-neoadjuvant and post-cystectomy decision-making in bladder cancer and emerging proof-of-concept data in renal cell carcinoma, and explore the potential application of ctDNA in the post-prostatectomy setting. Collectively, these data suggest that ctDNA may enable a paradigm shift toward biologically informed escalation and de-escalation of adjuvant therapy across GU malignancies, while underscoring the need for prospective validation in biomarker-driven clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.