Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41976313›Full record

ArticleCancers2026

Diagnostic Accuracy of [

Aishani Sachdeva, Mona Salem, John Jenkins, Kyle Wong, Gary J R Cook, Gurdip Azad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aishani SachdevaGuys and St. Thomas NHS Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Mona SalemGuys and St. Thomas NHS Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK.
John JenkinsGuys and St. Thomas NHS Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Kyle WongGuys and St. Thomas NHS Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Gary J R CookGuys and St. Thomas NHS Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8732-8134
Gurdip AzadGuys and St. Thomas NHS Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5373-1777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecise staging of prostate cancer is vital for treatment planning and prognosis. While [

methodsWe conducted a retrospective single-centre study involving 214 patients who underwent [

resultsOf the 214 included patients, 142 had follow-up imaging. Among 80 patients with bone lesions initially reported as metastatic, 74 (92.5%) were confirmed. Among 28 patients initially reported as having benign bone lesions, 26 (92.9%) remained benign on follow-up. Thirty-four patients with indeterminate lesions were reviewed; four were ultimately metastatic. Excluding indeterminate cases, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 97.4%, 86.7%, 94.9%, and 92.9%, respectively. Diagnostic discordance was primarily associated with benign uptake in the ribs, iliac bones, pubic rami and degenerative changes.

conclusions[

Indexed as

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11bone metastasisdiagnostic performanceimaging accuracyprostate cancerPSMA PET

Identifiers

PMID41976313
PMCPMC13072120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.