ReviewCancers2026
Precision-Engineered CD3 T-Cell Engagers for Solid Tumours: Conditional Activation, Microenvironment Modulation, and Clinical Translation.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Next-generation T cell engagers for cancer and autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundT-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies (TCEs) have transformed haematological malignancy treatment (blinatumomab > 40% complete remission), yet solid tumour efficacy remains limited (<15% response rates) due to antigen heterogeneity, immunosuppressive microenvironments, and T-cell dysfunction. Systematic molecular engineering, biomarker-driven patient selection, and rational tumour microenvironment modulation are now collectively transforming TCEs from experimental agents into an adaptable platform therapy for solid tumours.
methodsReview of 55 phase I-III trials of CD3-based TCEs in solid tumours, including tarlatamab (DLL3-targeted, small-cell lung cancer) and xaluritamig (STEAP1-targeted, prostate cancer). Analysis of next-generation engineering strategies and resistance mechanisms via genomic and immunohistochemical data.
resultResponse rates now approach ~40% in selected settings, marking an inflection point. In extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer, tarlatamab achieved ~40% responses with definitive survival benefit (phase III HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.77; DISCUSSION: Three resistance mechanisms limit durability: (i) antigen heterogeneity (28-60% of progressors develop antigen-negative subclones); (ii) immunosuppressive microenvironments (stromal barriers, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, hypoxia); (iii) T-cell exhaustion (PD-1/TIM-3/LAG-3 co-expression).
conclusionsNext-generation TCE platforms integrating conditional activation, cytokine payloads, and checkpoint modulation-deployed with biomarker-guided selection and TME-modulating combinations-represent a transformative therapeutic strategy. With tarlatamab's phase III survival benefit establishing clinical proof-of-concept, and pivotal trials underway for xaluritamig and next-generation agents, TCEs are positioned to become standard-of-care platform therapies in biomarker-defined solid tumours by 2028-2030.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.