ArticleCancers2026
Evaluation of Real-Life Data on Toxicity in Elderly Patients Undergoing Adjuvant External Beam Radiotherapy for Endometrial Carcinoma.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesEndometrial cancer is one of the most common malignancies of the female reproductive system. Fortunately, risk-adapted therapy offers a promising chance of recovery, even from locally advanced disease. In particular, older patients with higher risk factors benefit markedly from adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Nevertheless, this also carries a risk of higher cumulative toxicity thereafter. Although this phenomenon has been observed in older patients, it has not yet been adequately evaluated.
methodsThis retrospective study compared the clinical features of patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy with or without sequential chemotherapy or radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy between 2011 and 2023. The cohort was divided into two groups: patients over 65 years old and those under 65.
results100 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy at our center between 2011 and 2023. The mean age of patients was 66.87 years. We observed that neither diabetes, obesity, concurrent, sequential chemotherapy, nor para-aortic field irradiation was associated with an increased incidence of acute radiogenic side effects such as cystitis, diarrhea, proctitis, radiodermatitis, nausea, or vaginal dryness according to CTCAE ≥ 2 (all
conclusionsWe found no increase in toxicity in elderly patients after adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.