ReviewCancers2026
Minimal Residual Disease in Oncology: From Cure to Longitudinal Patient Management.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Residual disease in HER2-positive early breast cancer: are we escalating the RIGHT patients to T-DM1 or T-DXd?Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to the persistence of low-level malignant cells or tumor-derived nucleic acids that remain after curative-intent therapy and are undetectable by conventional diagnostic methods. In oncology, MRD has emerged as a powerful biomarker with well-established prognostic value in hematologic malignancies and rapidly expanding relevance in solid tumors. Advances in sensitive detection technologies, including multiparameter flow cytometry, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing, and digital polymerase chain reaction, have enabled the identification of residual disease at the molecular level, often preceding clinical or radiological relapse. Beyond its conventional role as a binary indicator of treatment response or cure, MRD is increasingly recognized as a dynamic longitudinal biomarker that supports personalized disease management. Within this evolving paradigm, patient-informed MRD strategies that incorporate tumor-specific molecular profiling and serial monitoring, particularly through circulating tumor DNA, offer the potential to guide treatment adaptation, including escalation, de-escalation, maintenance optimization, and surveillance strategies across both hematologic and solid malignancies. In this review, we summarize the biological basis of MRD, current and emerging detection methodologies, and clinical applications across cancer types, with a focus on patient-informed approaches. We also discuss key limitations, including assay standardization, biological variability in solid tumors, and the lack of clearly defined actionability thresholds. Finally, we highlight future directions for integrating MRD with multi-omics and AI-driven analytical frameworks to enable adaptive, risk-informed cancer management and advanced precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.