Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41976081›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

An Anuran-Based Biotic-Integrity Index for Prioritizing Wetland Conservation Sites in Rwanda.

Selina Glebsattel, J Maximilian Dehling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Selina GlebsattelInstitut für Integrierte Naturwissenschaften, Abteilung Biologie, Universität Koblenz, Universitätsstraße 1, 56070 Koblenz, Germany.
J Maximilian DehlingInstitut für Integrierte Naturwissenschaften, Abteilung Biologie, Universität Koblenz, Universitätsstraße 1, 56070 Koblenz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3533-5287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce an index based on the composition of amphibian communities that can be used to assess and monitor over time the biotic integrity of wetlands and to evaluate the priority of these sites for conservation. The Rwanda Anuran-based Biotic-Integrity Index (RABI) integrates three sub-indices, which reflect the conservation priority of species based on their distribution in Rwanda, their conservation status, and their susceptibility to habitat alteration. The functionality of the RABI was tested on 51 wetland sites distributed over the five ecozones of Rwanda. The wetland sites showed a wide range of RABI values, with marked differences between the different ecozones. The RABI reliably identified sites with a high number of threatened, range-restricted, and habitat-sensitive species and sites with high species richness. Although wetlands in agriculturally exploited areas often had high anuran-species numbers, their assemblages contained mostly widespread generalist species, resulting in lower RABI values compared to sites with lower species numbers but with threatened, specialized species. Wetlands within the four Rwandan national parks had particularly high RABI values, confirming that these areas require special protection. We identified five sites with high conservation value outside the national parks that should be considered for future protection.

Indexed as

amphibiansecozonesevaluationfreshwaterfrogshabitat lossmonitoringnational parks

Identifiers

PMID41976081
PMCPMC13072372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.