ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effect of a Guide-Suture-Assisted Modified Fascial Closure Technique on Postoperative Pain and Early Mobilization After Cesarean Section: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objections: One of the most common surgical procedures performed internationally is the cesarean section. It is known to be associated with intense postoperative pain and a slow recovery process. Focusing on surgical techniques, especially the type of fascial closure, is an area that has received very little attention when it comes to postoperative pain and rapid recovery. Using a mixed-methods approach, the primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of guide-suture-assisted modified fascial closure on postoperative pain and early mobilization after cesarean sections.
methodsWomen undergoing elective cesarean sections with Pfannenstiel's incision were the study participants of this prospective, single-center, randomized mixed-methods study. Participants were enrolled in the study and randomized to either classical continuous fascial closure or guide-suture-assisted modified fascial closure, which was carried out in a 1:1 ratio. Quantitative data assessed postoperative pain through the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and functional recovery was assessed through walking distances at postoperative 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews and analyzed through conventional content analysis to understand the patients' perceptions of pain and recovery experiences.
resultsThe first 24 h postoperative period pain levels were significantly lower for the modified fascial closure group versus the classical closure group (
conclusionsThe modified fascial closure technique with guide suture was linked to less pain in the early postoperative period and better functional recovery after cesarean section. This technique is a good candidate for addition to standard obstetric procedures since it is cost effective, easily added, and surgical practice will improve comfort for mothers and assist with early mobilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.