Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975826›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Democratizing Specialized Care in the Digital Age: Project ECHO as a Learning Environment for Continuing Professional Development.

Ilian Cruz-Panesso, Lucie Fuzeau, Brenda Lécuyer, Mélanie Demers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ilian Cruz-PanessoDirection de l'Enseignement et de l'Académie (DEAC), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.
Lucie FuzeauDirection de l'Enseignement et de l'Académie (DEAC), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-2238-3220
Brenda LécuyerDirection de l'Enseignement et de l'Académie (DEAC), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.
Mélanie DemersDirection de l'Enseignement et de l'Académie (DEAC), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health technologies have reshaped continuing professional development (CPD) in healthcare. However, learning in digitally mediated programs is often assumed rather than explicitly designed and assessed. Project ECHO

objectivesThis article conceptualizes Project ECHO as a structured learning environment and proposes a theoretically grounded framework for examining and assessing learning processes in digital CPD.

methodsUsing situated learning, communities of practice, and cognitive apprenticeship as analytical lenses, this conceptual analysis examines participation structures, distributed expertise, facilitation practices, and case-based dialogue in ECHO sessions. Principles of constructive alignment inform a process-oriented assessment approach aligned with CPD evaluation models such as Moore's framework. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: This article develops a theory-informed framework that conceptualizes Project ECHO as a structured learning architecture for digital continuing professional development. The framework identifies how participation, distributed expertise, facilitation, and case-based dialogue support learning processes during ECHO sessions. It also proposes process-oriented indicators to make learning dynamics more visible alongside outcome-based evaluation approaches.

conclusionsBy foregrounding learning processes, this analysis offers a conceptual foundation to strengthening pedagogical alignment, faculty development, and assessment design in ECHO programs. The framework contributes to digital CPD scholarship by clarifying how learning develops within telementoring environments and by guiding future research and program refinement. More specifically, the article contributes a process-oriented evaluation perspective that helps make learning quality more visible within telementoring environments, thereby complementing dominant outcome-focused CPD models.

Indexed as

assessment alignmentclinical reasoningcontinuing professional developmentdigital health educationlearning architecturelearning sciencesProject ECHOtelementoring

Identifiers

PMID41975826
PMCPMC13073213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.