ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Harmonising ctDNA Measurement in Haematological Malignancies: Traceability, Commutability and Reporting.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) assays are increasingly applied in haematological malignancies for non-invasive genotyping, quantitative response assessment, measurable residual disease (MRD) detection, and relapse surveillance, often complementing bone marrow-based testing and, in selected scenarios, potentially reducing its frequency. Yet, translating ctDNA results into comparable clinical decisions across laboratories, platforms, and time remains challenging because ctDNA measurements are influenced by the definition of the measurand (for example, variant allele fraction versus mutant molecules per mL), pre-analytical variables, end-to-end workflow losses, and lineage-specific confounders such as clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), therapy-related clonal haematopoiesis, and compartmental disease (marrow, plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, extramedullary sites). This review proposes a harmonisation framework for haematological ctDNA based on three linked concepts-metrological traceability, which connects reported values to reference systems with stated uncertainty, commutability, which ensures that reference materials behave like patient specimens across diverse workflows and fit-for-purpose reference materials that support calibration, and quality control, external quality assessment, and cut-off setting for intended uses such as early molecular response in large B-cell lymphoma, molecular MRD in acute myeloid leukaemia, and deep response monitoring in multiple myeloma. This framework is accompanied by harmonised CHIP-aware reporting rules for settings without matched cellular DNA and practical change-control/bridging strategies to preserve clinical decision thresholds when platforms or bioinformatic pipelines evolve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.