ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Who Actually Dies from Indoor Air Pollution? A Forensic Perspective.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In high-income countries, humans are continuously exposed to indoor and outdoor air pollution. Chronic exposure to these airborne solids and gases from natural or artificial sources is related to higher mortality. The objective of this work is to critically assess whether the association between indoor air pollution and death can support robust causal inference from a strict medico-legal perspective. We conducted a narrative review of existing literature on reported health consequences, autopsy and histopathological findings potentially linked to indoor air pollution exposure, and dose-response relationships and examined their role in criminal liability in Western countries. Despite prevention measures and regulations, establishing criminal liability for indoor air pollution remains arduous beyond a reasonable doubt given associative epidemiological evidence, translational biases, and non-specific autopsy findings. Further research on non-linear models and targeted forensic investigations is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.