ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Therapeutic Termination of Pregnancy Under the Umbrella of Environmental, Socio-Economic Factors and High-Risk Pregnancy.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic termination of pregnancy (TToP) represents an intervention that is performed for medical reasons, such as risks to maternal health or severe fetal anomalies. Advances in prenatal screening and diagnostic tools-including serum markers, ultrasound, cell-free fetal DNA, chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis-have significantly improved early detection and clinical decision-making. This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on the genetic, environmental and psychosocial determinants that influence the decision of the patients to pursue TToP. The literature search was performed primarily using PubMed database, while Scopus and Google Scholar were used to identify additional relevant studies. Some of the selected studies, as well as certain sections of this review, address both therapeutic and voluntary termination of pregnancy, whereas others focus exclusively on TToP. Moreover, this review describes the types of abortion (medical or surgical/aspiration) along with their management strategies to prevent or address potential complications. It is well known that demographic, cultural and socio-economic factors continue to influence the access to TToP, as well as the perceptions of it. Psychiatric comorbidities (such as anxiety, affective and psychotic disorders) are observed with a higher prevalence among women undergoing TToP and may influence both the decision and psychological outcomes post-procedure. While most women report emotional relief after TToP, some of them experience depression, post-traumatic stress disorder or substance misuse. Legal and ethical considerations further complicate access to safe abortion, leading to situations where patients may resort to unsafe procedures, which result in higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Data from the EUROCAT network show rising trends in congenital anomalies like trisomy 13, trisomy 18 and caudal regression syndrome (conditions commonly associated with TToP). Therefore, it is mandatory to form a multidisciplinary team in these cases, integrating medical, psychological and ethical dimensions. Ensuring safe, evidence-based and compassionate access to TToP remains a critical component of reproductive healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.