ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026
Ankle Joint Biomechanics in Recreational Runners with Resolved and Incident Plantar Fasciitis: A One-Year Prospective 4HAIE Cohort Study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare running biomechanics between retrospective and prospective cases of plantar fasciitis, and healthy matched controls. A further analysis from the 4HAIE cohort, the current study included four groups: 10 prospectively newly injured runners with plantar fasciitis during the 1-year follow-up (PPF), 14 retrospectively injured runners with no report of any prospective lower limb injury (RPF; resolved plantar fasciitis), and two groups of 24 matched healthy controls (10 CON1 and 14 CON2; matching criteria: sex, age, weakly running distance, BMI, height, mass, and body fat). All participants completed eight overground running trials, during which three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Key variables included vertical component of ground reaction force (VGRF) and ankle joint angle waveforms. Statistical parametric mapping using paired and independent t-tests was performed to identify differences between groups. In addition, baseline MRI of plantar fascia and inflammatory markers were evaluated as control variables. The most notable findings were observed in the frontal plane: the PPF group showed significantly greater ankle eversion compared to CON1 (between 10%-100% stance, p < 0.001) and RPF (0%-100% stance, p < 0.001). In addition, both PPF and RPF displayed greater VGRF than their controls (25%-50% stance, p < 0.001). These findings offer new insights into plantar fasciitis-related running biomechanics. Prevention and management may benefit from altered technique and motion-control/stability footwear or insoles, particularly in runners with a history of plantar fasciitis and in uninjured runners exhibiting elevated ankle eversion and increased VGRF near peak eversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.