Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975630›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026

Ankle Joint Biomechanics in Recreational Runners with Resolved and Incident Plantar Fasciitis: A One-Year Prospective 4HAIE Cohort Study.

Jan Plesek, Joseph Hamill, Pavel Brtva, Jiri Skypala, Jan Urbaczka, David Zahradnik, Julia Freedman Silvernail, Lukas Cipryan, Milos Golian, Jan Sustek and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jan PlesekDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6496-0751
Joseph HamillDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0802-9708
Pavel BrtvaDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4589-7611
Jiri SkypalaDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3617-2926
Jan UrbaczkaDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1669-189X
David ZahradnikDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4777-1588
Julia Freedman SilvernailDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8792-696X
Lukas CipryanDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2403-8797
Milos GolianDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Jan SustekInstitute for Research and Applications of Fuzzy Modeling, University of Ostrava, CE IT4Innovations, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4485-2868
Daniel JandackaDepartment of Human Movement Studies, Human Motion Diagnostic Centre, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2653-2569

Funding

LERCO CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000003Research of Excellence on Digital Technologies and Wellbeing CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare running biomechanics between retrospective and prospective cases of plantar fasciitis, and healthy matched controls. A further analysis from the 4HAIE cohort, the current study included four groups: 10 prospectively newly injured runners with plantar fasciitis during the 1-year follow-up (PPF), 14 retrospectively injured runners with no report of any prospective lower limb injury (RPF; resolved plantar fasciitis), and two groups of 24 matched healthy controls (10 CON1 and 14 CON2; matching criteria: sex, age, weakly running distance, BMI, height, mass, and body fat). All participants completed eight overground running trials, during which three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Key variables included vertical component of ground reaction force (VGRF) and ankle joint angle waveforms. Statistical parametric mapping using paired and independent t-tests was performed to identify differences between groups. In addition, baseline MRI of plantar fascia and inflammatory markers were evaluated as control variables. The most notable findings were observed in the frontal plane: the PPF group showed significantly greater ankle eversion compared to CON1 (between 10%-100% stance, p < 0.001) and RPF (0%-100% stance, p < 0.001). In addition, both PPF and RPF displayed greater VGRF than their controls (25%-50% stance, p < 0.001). These findings offer new insights into plantar fasciitis-related running biomechanics. Prevention and management may benefit from altered technique and motion-control/stability footwear or insoles, particularly in runners with a history of plantar fasciitis and in uninjured runners exhibiting elevated ankle eversion and increased VGRF near peak eversion.

Indexed as

Ankle JointFasciitis, PlantarRunningAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective Studiesfoot painheel painkinematicskineticsplantar fasciopathyrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41975630
PMCPMC13077024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.