ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026
Agricultural abundance, dietary shortfall: national determinants of daily fruit and vegetable intake in Türkiye National Nutrition and Health Survey.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTürkiye is one of the world's leading producers of fruits and vegetables (F&V). Yet, findings from the Türkiye Nutrition and Health Surveys (TNHS-2010 and TNHS-2017) reveal a 24.3% decline in consumption over this period. This discrepancy between agricultural capacity and dietary intake highlights the need to better understand factors associated with consumption. This disconnect between agricultural abundance and dietary intake underscores the need to understand the factors influencing F&V consumption at the population level.
methodsThis cross-sectional secondary analysis used data from the nationally representative TNHS-2017. The analytic sample included 12,406 individuals aged ≥ 15 years who completed the Food Frequency Questionnaire. Anthropometric measurements were obtained by trained dietitians in Family Health Centers across all 81 provinces of the country; pregnant and lactating women were excluded. F&V intake was categorized as daily versus non-daily, and freshly squeezed fruit juice as never, occasional, or daily. Binary logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with daily F&V intake, and multinomial logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with juice consumption.
resultsDaily F&V intake was observed in 38.6% of participants. Higher odds of daily intake were seen among women (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.44-1.73), older adults, individuals with greater physical activity, and dietary supplement users, whereas higher food insecurity was inversely associated with daily intake (aOR per unit 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.93). Regional disparities were pronounced, with higher odds in the Mediterranean and Middle East Anatolia and lower odds in several inland and northeastern regions relative to the Aegean. BMI and body roundness index were not independently associated with intake after adjustment. For freshly squeezed fruit juice, occasional consumption was more likely among higher-educated groups and supplement users and less likely among smokers and food-insecure individuals. Daily juice consumption was rare.
conclusionsIn Türkiye, daily F&V intake was associated with sociodemographic, regional, behavioral, and food security factors rather than body size indicators. These findings provide nationally relevant evidence to support strategies aimed at improving fruit and vegetable consumption, particularly by addressing affordability, regional disparities, and food insecurity, while clarifying the limited role of juice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.