ArticleImplementation science communications2026
Development of implementation strategies for the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (NEAR4PEM) pre-intubation checklist: a prospective, pre-implementation planning study.
Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (NEAR4PEM) pre-intubation checklist was rigorously developed and usability-tested for pediatric emergency departments (PEDs), but effective integration into routine PED practice has not been systematically planned. We undertook a structured implementation planning process to identify site-level barriers and develop a context-responsive implementation plan to support checklist adoption.
methodsTo develop strategies to support adoption, a disciplinarily-diverse team of PED clinicians performed a five-step stakeholder-informed barrier prioritization and strategy-matching process. In Step 1, focus groups and surveys were employed to identify barriers and facilitators to checklist implementation. In Step 2, barriers were ranked on feasibility to address and potential impact if addressed in order to identify which determinants to prioritize in strategy selection. In Step 3, implementation strategies were selected to address prioritized barriers via virtual facilitated sessions. In Step 4, these strategies were ranked for feasibility and impact by Advisory Board (AB) members to guide decision making around which to include in the final implementation plan. In step 5, the AB detailed the prioritized implementation strategies in an implementation plan.
resultsSixteen unique barriers were identified, 6 of which were prioritized. 24 strategies were generated, 19 of which were prioritized and included in our implementation plan. Prioritized strategies addressed key barriers like staff turnover and competing job responsibilities, utilizing approaches like folding the checklist into provider training, and creating a network of airway champions to promote the checklist's implementation.
conclusionsIn addition to generating a list of strategies to support this effort, this study serves as a proof of concept that a participatory and somewhat resource-intensive process can successfully be executed in a complex emergency setting. By linking prioritized barriers to operationalized implementation strategies, it offers a practical framework for translating determinant assessment into actionable implementation plans for low-frequency, high-risk workflows. Future work will evaluate implementation and patient outcomes during checklist rollout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.