ArticleBMC psychology2026
Secrecy abilities and attitudes: development and psychometric validation of two secrecy scales.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSecrecy, defined as the intentional concealment of personal information, is a widespread yet understudied phenomenon. This study aimed to shed light on individual differences in secrecy by introducing two novel scales to assess one’s ability to keep secrets and one’s attitude toward secrecy.
methodsAn online survey was administered, encompassing the Common Secrecy Questionnaire (CSQ) alongside the newly developed Secrecy Ability Scale (SAB) and Secrecy Attitude Scale (SAT), complemented by various additional scales.
resultsConfirmatory factor analyses supported the proposed structure of both new scales. Results showed good internal consistency, discriminant validity, and fair 6-month test-retest reliability. Nearly all participants (97%) reported keeping at least one secret, with an average of 14. Common secrets included lying, romantic desires while single, and concealed family details. Participants generally reported a high ability to keep secrets and a moderately positive attitude toward secrecy.
conclusionsTaken together, the results suggest that one’s ability to keep secrets and attitude toward secrecy are distinct phenomena. These findings deepen our understanding of individual differences in secrecy and offer a foundation for future psychological research and applied interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.