ArticleBMC psychology2026
Verification of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Exteroceptive Body Awareness Questionnaire (EBA-q) in the older Chinese adults.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to adapt the Exteroceptive Body Awareness Questionnaire (EBA-q) into Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties in the older adult population, addressing the lack of a validated assessment tool. Utilizing convenience sampling, the research recruited 940 older adults (51.8% male, 48.2% female, mean age = 71.07 years). The original scale underwent cultural adaptation and linguistic translation, and its psychometric properties were rigorously evaluated through item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and assessments of internal consistency reliability. The results demonstrated that the Chinese EBA-q successfully replicated the original scale’s four‑factor dimensional structure (Visuo‑tactile awareness, Spatial coordination, Awareness of body changes, and Awareness of clothing fit). Model comparisons indicated that a correlated four‑factor model provided a better fit in older Chinese adults than the bifactor structure proposed in the original study, possibly reflecting cultural or developmental distinctions. The scale exhibited excellent internal consistency and established measurement invariance across gender and region. In conclusion, the Chinese EBA‑q exhibits robust reliability and validity. The adapted scale is thus a suitable tool for assessing exteroceptive body awareness in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.