Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975488›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

C5-C6 and thoracic spine mobilization with postural correction exercise compared with conventional therapy in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a two-group, parallel-arm, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial-study protocol.

Watson Arulsingh, Arthur de Sá Ferreira, Praveen Kumar Kandakurti, Sharad S Patil

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06449261 (C5-C6 and Thoracic Spine Mobilization With Postural Correction Exercise Compared With Conventional Therapy in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis - A Two-group, Parallel-arm, Single-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06449261 naunknown statusnot on this map

C5-C6 and Thoracic Spine Mobilization With Postural Correction Exercise Compared With Conventional Therapy in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis - A Two-group, Parallel-arm, Single-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGulf Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsAdhesive Capsulitis of ShoulderArmsSpinal Manual therapy used in Physiotherapy Practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Watson ArulsinghDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE.
Arthur de Sá FerreiraPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação - PPGCR, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta, UNISUAM, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Praveen Kumar KandakurtiDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE. dean.coahs@gmu.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2669-4488
Sharad S PatilThumbay Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Hospital, Ajman, UAE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdhesive capsulitis (AC) often resolves independently but can persist for years and may not fully improve. The most effective treatments for AC are not well established. Although the shoulder girdle muscles are primarily controlled by the cervical nerve roots, particularly C5 and C6, research linking these roots to the pathogenesis of AC is currently lacking. While existing studies suggest a connection between thoracic mobility, posture, and shoulder mobility, the potential benefits of mobilizing the C5-C6 region and thoracic spine, in conjunction with postural correction exercises for treating AC, have yet to be explored.

objectivesThis study protocol will be to assess the effectiveness of C5-C6 and thoracic spine mobilization combined with postural correction exercises, compared to conventional therapy, in alleviating pain, improving range of motion (ROM), and reducing disability in patients with AC.

methodsThis study will be a two-group, randomized controlled trial with assessors blinded to group assignments. A total of 66 adults with AC will be randomly allocated into two groups: the experimental group (n = 33), which will undergo C5-C6 and thoracic spine mobilization along with postural correction exercises, and the control group (n = 33), which will receive conventional therapy, for 3 weeks. The primary outcomes will include shoulder pain, shoulder joint range of motion, and the Disability Index, all of which will be assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 months after randomization. An intention-to-treat approach will be employed for the analysis. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis will be performed using a per-protocol approach to examine the potential impact of incomplete adherence and participant dropout. Linear mixed models will be applied to investigate the main effects and interactions of the group and time on the study outcomes, adjusting for covariates such as age, sex, duration of condition, and presence of comorbidities. Multiple imputation methods will be utilized to address any missing data. DISCUSSION: This study's findings will help assess the effectiveness of spinal manual therapy combined with postural correction exercises in patients with AC compared to traditional physiotherapy. Additionally, the prognostic value of AC may be improved based on these results. We will track the treatment outcomes through immediate, short-term, and mid-term follow-ups. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06449261. This study protocol is Version 1.0, dated 07 June 2024.

Indexed as

BursitisCervical VertebraeExercise TherapyPostureShoulder JointShoulder PainThoracic VertebraeAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdhesive capsulitisExerciseFrozen shoulderJoint mobilizationPainPhysical therapy modalitiesRange of motion

Identifiers

PMID41975488
PMCPMC13181870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.