Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975485›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2026

An integrated clinical-research training model for professional master's degree postgraduate medical students: a controlled educational study.

Junping Yao, Jing Qi, Chen Huang, Yuanfeng Wei, Hesheng He

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junping YaoDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2, Zheshan West Road, Wuhu, Anhu, 241001, China.
Jing QiDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2, Zheshan West Road, Wuhu, Anhu, 241001, China.
Chen HuangDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2, Zheshan West Road, Wuhu, Anhu, 241001, China.
Yuanfeng WeiDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2, Zheshan West Road, Wuhu, Anhu, 241001, China.
Hesheng HeDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, No. 2, Zheshan West Road, Wuhu, Anhu, 241001, China. hhsmed2013@126.com.

Funding

The Anhui Provincial Key Teaching Research Project 2020jyxm2104The Anhui Provincial New Era Quality Education Program 2023zyxwjxalk150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn China, professional master’s degree postgraduate medical education is closely integrated with standardized residency training, emphasizing clinical competence but often providing limited structured exposure to research training. This imbalance may hinder the development of clinician-scholars capable of integrating evidence-based medicine into clinical practice.

methodsWe conducted a controlled educational study between September 2020 and August 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, a tertiary teaching hospital, enrolling 140 professional master’s degree postgraduate medical students in internal medicine who participated in clinical rotations. Students were randomly assigned to a traditional clinical teaching model (control group, n = 70) or an integrated clinical-research teaching model (intervention group, n = 70) using a computer-generated random number list. The intervention embedded laboratory training, clinical research methodology and study design, biostatistics, and individualized research tasks into routine clinical teaching without reducing clinical training time. Outcomes were evaluated across three domains using a 5-point Likert self-assessment scale: self-perceived clinical competence, self-perceived research-related competence, and teaching satisfaction with perceived educational value.

resultsOverall self-perceived clinical competence scores did not differ significantly between the control and intervention groups. However, the control group reported higher competence in patient assessment and management, whereas the intervention group reported higher competence in evidence integration. The intervention group also demonstrated significantly higher self-perceived research competence, including literature retrieval, critical appraisal, research engagement, and overall research scores. However, no significant differences were observed in research design understanding or biostatistics and data interpretation between the two groups. Teaching satisfaction and perceived usefulness for research development were significantly higher in the intervention group, while perceived usefulness for clinical practice was comparable between groups.

conclusionsAn integrated clinical-research teaching model was associated with improved research-related self-perceived competence and higher learner satisfaction among professional master’s degree postgraduate medical students. While overall self-perceived clinical competence remained comparable between groups, domain-specific differences were observed, with lower scores in patient assessment and management but higher scores in evidence integration in the intervention group. These findings suggest that integrating research training into clinical education represents a feasible and pragmatic approach within China’s standardized residency training system.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateInternal MedicineModels, EducationalStudents, MedicalAdultChinaEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleClinical competenceIntegrated clinical-research teaching modelPostgraduate medical educationResearch training

Identifiers

PMID41975485
PMCPMC13218022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.