Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975475›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2026

Local farmers, custodians of wild food plant knowledge and uses in the touristified Venice Lagoon.

Tiziana Floridia, Jimlea Nadezhda Mendoza, Edy Fantinato, Dauro Mattia Zocchi, Lorenzo Barbasetti di Prun, Renata Sõukand, Giulia Mattalia

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tiziana FloridiaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Via Torino 155, Mestre, 30172, Venezia, Italy. tizianafloridia@ub.edu.
Jimlea Nadezhda MendozaDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Via Torino 155, Mestre, 30172, Venezia, Italy.
Edy FantinatoDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Via Torino 155, Mestre, 30172, Venezia, Italy.
Dauro Mattia ZocchiUniversity of Gastronomic Sciences, Piazza Vittorio Emanuele II 9, Pollenzo, 12042, Italy.
Lorenzo Barbasetti di PrunPrometheus Open Food Lab, Venice, Italy.
Renata SõukandDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Via Torino 155, Mestre, 30172, Venezia, Italy. renata.soukand@unive.it.
Giulia MattaliaFacultat de Farmàcia i Ciències de l'Alimentació, Laboratori de Botànica-Unitat Associada CSIC, Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, 08028, Catalonia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe islands of Sant'Erasmo and Vignole, nestled in the Venice Lagoon, are biocultural refugia, where local ecological knowledge (LEK) of local communities, vital for wetland conservation, is being eroded by factors such as rural depopulation, globalization and touristification. This study investigates Local Gastronomic Knowledge (LGK) of Wild Food Plants (WFPs) among farmers and fishers to determine how occupation specialization influences knowledge distribution. It also investigates the ability of farmers to transform LGK into an economic resource by creating (or entering) niche economies, even though being immersed in a touristified and globalized context.

methodsFrom 2022 to 2025, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 farmers (Sant'Erasmo and Vignole) and 31 fishers of the Venice lagoon.

resultsWe documented 39 wild plant taxa, focusing on folk taxonomy, culinary preparations, and sale of WFPs. A significant occupational knowledge gap was identified: 94% of farmers utilized wild plants (with 70% of them also involved in their sale), naming 39 taxa, whereas fishers reported minimal knowledge representing only 10% of the sample (three out of 31 interviewed) and naming 2 out of the 39 documented taxa, confirming that LGK is tied to everyday contact with specific resources. Farmers demonstrated a very specialized knowledge, including 35% of uses previously unrecorded at the regional or national level.

conclusionsThe findings of this study reveal that LGK among farmers, thus people who live in close connection with the soil and vegetation of the Venice lagoon, is still vivid and it is increasingly economically valued. The study also shows a sharp distinction in the LGK on WFPs between farmers and fishers, revealing a strong knowledge specialization tied to their primary occupation, essential in a context of rural depopulation and touristification, for identifying knowledge hotspots and supporting the resilience of local economies. Furthermore, the economic valorization of WFPs (through their incorporation into local short food supply chains) may further encourage their continued use and LGK transmission. We believe this may empower farmers and facilitate the expansion of WFP markets, shedding light on a positive narrative that sees farmers as active custodians of LGK, rather than as passively subjected to globalization, especially in tourist areas as the Venice lagoon is.

Indexed as

EthnobotanyFarmersKnowledgePlants, EdibleConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansItalyEthnobotanyFarmersFishersLocal gastronomic knowledgeNiche economyRural areasWild food plants

Identifiers

PMID41975475
PMCPMC13185300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.