ArticleBMC health services research2026
Examining the association between prior medical mistreatment and interest in and support for over-the-counter medication abortion among people seeking in-person abortion in the United States.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile previous research indicates that most people seeking facility-based abortion care are interested in over-the-counter (OTC) access to medication abortion (MA), few studies have examined whether people who have experienced medical mistreatment support OTC access. We assessed whether prior experiences of medical mistreatment are associated with interest in and support for OTC MA among people seeking abortion care in the United States (US).
methodsWe analyzed cross-sectional survey data from 9 US abortion facilities from June 2021 to December 2022, among people seeking in-person abortion ≥ 15 years old who spoke English or Spanish. Participants completed surveys on demographics, clinical characteristics, OTC MA interest/support, and prior experiences of medical mistreatment and their effects on subsequent care-seeking. We conducted unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses examining associations between history of medical mistreatment (none, having been ignored and/or ridiculed by healthcare providers, and having delayed or forgone care due to prior mistreatment) and interest in and support for OTC MA.
resultsAmong 1,360 respondents, 39% reported prior experiences of medical mistreatment, of whom 48% (258/537) had delayed care and 40% (215/537) had forgone care due to mistreatment. Overall, 72% expressed interest in and 85% supported OTC MA. In adjusted analyses, compared to people with no history of medical mistreatment, a larger proportion of participants who had delayed or forgone care (302/1,360, 22%) due to prior mistreatment expressed personal interest in (82.8%, [95% Confidence Interval 77.0%-88.6%] vs. 67.5% [61.4%-73.6%]) and support for (93.7% [89.9%-97.5%] vs. 80.5% [74.7%-86.3%]) OTC MA.
conclusionsMany patients seeking abortion care in the US have previously experienced medical mistreatment and find OTC MA appealing, especially those who have delayed or forgone healthcare due to previous mistreatment. By prioritizing patient autonomy, agency, self-efficacy and accessibility, OTC MA could improve reproductive health outcomes and equity, particularly for those historically and repeatedly marginalized by healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.