ArticleBMC medicine2026
Intraoperative use of sodium oxybate to prevent postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis matters arising article addresses the recently published article in BMC Medicine by Cui et al., titled "Prophylactic effect of intraoperative sodium oxybate on postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery: a randomized clinical trial." MAIN BODY: The work by Cui et al. demonstrated that intraoperative administration of sodium oxybate only significantly reduced postoperative delirium (POD) incidence in the participants undergoing morning surgery but not in those with afternoon surgery. Although this trial provided evidence that sodium oxybate may reduce POD, we raise several concerns regarding methodology and generalizability, such as incomplete control of perioperative risk factors, underestimated incidence of POD, subgroup analysis without multiple adjustments of confounding factors, and inadequate postoperative pain strategy. To verify the findings of this trial in further researches, we advocate the implementation of multi-center randomized clinical trials with large sample sizes, strict control of perioperative confounding factors, precise assessment of POD episodes, and the inclusion of subgroup analysis with multiple adjustments.
conclusionThis matters arising does not seek to deny the results of Cui et al.'s trial. The main purpose of the authors is to emphasize that above methodological refinements are crucial for translating this valuable evidence into generally clinical practice and improving final outcomes of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.