ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Health literacy and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among patients with urolithiasis.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common among patients with chronic and recurrent conditions, including urinary system stones. Understanding the relationship between patients’ attitudes toward CAM and their level of health literacy is essential for promoting informed and safe use of complementary therapies.
methodsThis descriptive study was conducted at the Urology Clinic of Balıkesir University Hospital and included 202 patients who underwent surgery for urolithiasis. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Medicine Attitude Scale (HCAMAS), and the Health Literacy Scale (HLS). Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis were performed.
resultsThe mean age of the participants was 49.48 ± 13.37 years, and 64.3% reported using CAM, with medicinal waters being the most frequently preferred method (70.63%). Participants demonstrated moderate levels of both CAM attitudes (HCAMAS: 32.69 ± 5.29) and health literacy (HLS: 32.60 ± 8.68). Correlation analyses indicated very weak but statistically significant inverse associations between CAM attitudes and the critical and interactive dimensions of health literacy, as well as between the CAM subdimension and critical health literacy. CART analysis identified educational level as the strongest determinant of both health literacy and CAM attitudes.
conclusionAlthough no overall association was observed between CAM attitudes and health literacy, the high prevalence of CAM use underscores the need for targeted patient education regarding complementary therapies. Strengthening health literacy through tailored educational interventions may promote informed decision-making and support the safe integration of CAM with conventional medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.