ArticleBMC health services research2026
Performance in healthcare: a conceptual analysis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of “performance” is widely used across disciplines, yet remains ambiguously defined, particularly in healthcare. This conceptual ambiguity poses challenges for researchers, managers, and policymakers in effectively evaluating and improving organisational outcomes in complex environments such as hospitals.
methodsThis study employed Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis method to clarify the concept of “performance” in healthcare. The process involved: (1) identifying the concept of interest; (2) determining surrogate terms and relevant uses; (3) selecting an appropriate realm for data collection through systematic literature searches in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar; (4) identifying attributes of the concept; (5) determining antecedents and consequences; (6) analyzing related concepts; and (7) generating a model case. The analysis was further refined through multiple focus group discussions using brainstorming techniques with healthcare experts to consolidate performance-related dimensions.
resultsThe analysis revealed significant inconsistencies in how performance is defined and measured in healthcare literature. We identified 21 distinct performance dimensions, which were integrated into a novel four-level framework termed the Umbrella Performance Model (UPM). This model positions performance as a conceptual-descriptive framework that integrates not only traditional elements such as productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness, but also 18 additional, healthcare-specific dimensions, that clarify performance boundaries and interrelationships.
conclusionThe UPM provides a unified framework for understanding performance in healthcare organisations, particularly hospitals. By introducing this model, the study aims to reduce conceptual ambiguity and offer a holistic approach to performance evaluation that moves beyond traditional efficiency-based metrics. The model serves as a practical guide for health service researchers, managers, and policymakers to assess and improve organisational performance more comprehensively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.