ArticleBMC medical education2026
Development and validation of a Novel 3D-printed mold-based silicone model for laparoscopic duodenal stump reinforcement suture simulation training.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic duodenal stump reinforcement suture (LDSRS) is a critical yet technically challenging procedure in gastrointestinal surgery. Traditional training methods using animal models or cadavers are costly and ethically constrained. This study aims to develop and evaluate a novel, cost-effective, and safe 3D-printed mold-based silicone model for LDSRS simulation training.
methodThe model was validated through a multi-phase evaluation. Ten expert laparoscopic surgeons (senior group) evaluated the model’s face and content validity using 5-point Likert scales. Twenty trainee surgeons, divided by clinical experience into intermediate (n = 10) and junior (n = 10) groups, completed ten training sessions to assess training effectiveness. Operative time and performance scores across groups were recorded and compared to assess structural validity of model.
resultsExperts confirmed high face and content validity (all items > 4/5, except texture: 3.70 ± 0.82). Construct validity was strong: performance scores increased significantly with experience (junior: 17.35 ± 0.69; intermediate: 22.90 ± 0.79; senior: 33.6 ± 1.13; p < .001), while time decreased (junior: 22.87 ± 0.84 min; intermediate: 17.81 ± 0.32 min; senior: 4.90 ± 0.20 min; p < .001). Learning curves showed proficiency gains both intermediate and junior groups, with inflection points at session 6 (juniors) and session 4 (intermediates), respectively.
conclusionThe developed 3D-printed mold-based silicone model demonstrates high realism and is a valid and effective tool for LDSRS simulation training. It shows potential for improving technical skills within a simulated setting and may serve as a valuable component of structured surgical training curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.