ArticleBMC medical education2026
Effectiveness and retention of extremity and junctional tourniquet training among medical interns.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic hemorrhage, particularly in extremities and junctional regions, is a life-threatening condition requiring rapid intervention. Although a critical competency for medical interns, tourniquet training remains frequently underrepresented in curricula. This study evaluates the impact of structured, simulation-based training on interns’ knowledge, attitudes, self-confidence, self-efficacy, and skills. It also assesses the learning curve for junctional tourniquet application and skill retention over two months.
methodsThis prospective, longitudinal study included 32 medical interns during their emergency medicine rotation. Participants received three hours of theoretical and simulation-based training based on Advanced Trauma Life Support, Tactical Combat Casualty Care, and Stop the Bleed curricula. Training utilized commercial extremity and SAM Junctional tourniquets. Knowledge, practical skills, attitudes, self-confidence, and self-efficacy were assessed pre-training, immediately post-training, and at a two-month follow-up. Data were analyzed using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Bonferroni correction.
resultsAll 32 participants completed the study. Following training, significant improvements were observed in knowledge, skills (extremity and junctional), attitudes, self-confidence, and self- efficacy scores (p < 0.001). Notably, junctional tourniquet skill scores, in which participants had almost no prior familiarity, increased from 1.7 ± 2.1 to 10.8 ± 0.9 and these skill gains were statistically maintained at the two-month follow-up (10.4 ± 1.0). Although extremity tourniquet skill and self-confidence scores declined significantly at two months compared with immediate post-training levels (p < 0.001), they remained above baseline values. Demographics and prior experience did not significantly impact outcomes.
conclusionSimulation-based tourniquet training significantly improves medical interns’ tourniquet knowledge and skills. The findings suggest that interns can effectively acquire and maintain the skill of applying junctional tourniquets, an area often underrepresented in standard medical curricula. In contrast, the observed modest decline in extremity tourniquet skills and self-confidence suggests that a single training exposure may not be sufficient to fully mitigate skill decay, highlighting the potential value of periodic refresher sessions. Interestingly, a comparable decline was not evident in junctional tourniquet application. This pattern may be interpreted within the framework of deep processing, whereby information perceived as novel and clinically salient is processed with greater cognitive engagement, potentially facilitating more durable encoding and retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.