Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975383›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Restoring well-being through nature: a mixed-methods study of co-designed therapeutic gardening among people experiencing homelessness.

Catalina Cruz-Piedrahita, Marta Luna-Martinez, Maria Mar Delgado-Serrano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catalina Cruz-PiedrahitaDepartamento de Economía Agraria, Universidad de Córdoba, Edificio Gregor Mendel. N-IV, km 396, Córdoba, 14014, Spain.
Marta Luna-MartinezDepartamento de Economía Agraria, Universidad de Córdoba, Edificio Gregor Mendel. N-IV, km 396, Córdoba, 14014, Spain.
Maria Mar Delgado-SerranoDepartamento de Economía Agraria, Universidad de Córdoba, Edificio Gregor Mendel. N-IV, km 396, Córdoba, 14014, Spain. mmdelgado@uco.es.

Funding

Horizon 2020 869227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNature-based interventions are increasingly recognised for their potential to support psychological well-being and social inclusion among vulnerable populations. However, few studies have examined the short-term effects of therapeutic gardening among individuals experiencing homelessness, a group at high risk of poor mental and physical health.

methodsThis mixed-methods study evaluated a participatory gardening programme implemented at a homeless shelter in Córdoba, Spain. Participants play an important role in the co-creation and co-management of therapeutic green spaces through a structured “co-co-co-co” methodology (co-design, co-deployment, co-management, and co-assessment). Quantitative data were collected via adapted scales from validated instruments (Well-Being Index, Psychological Distress Scale, Self-Rated Health) adapted to assess immediate pre- and post-session changes. An additional environmental perception scale conceptually grounded in an integrated restorative environment framework, drawing from the biophilia hypothesis, Attention Restoration Theory, and Stress Reduction Theory, was administered. In-depth semi-structured interviews explored participants’ experiences and perceived outcomes.

resultsQuantitative analyses revealed statistically significant improvements in well-being, perceived physical health, and psychological distress among gardening participants, with large effect sizes. In contrast, the comparison group, which engaged in unstructured shelter-based activities, showed no meaningful change. The environmental perception data indicated strong appreciation for features such as water and sensory comfort, with less emphasis on biodiversity. In-depth semi-structured interviews corroborated these findings, highlighting the importance of structure, emotional support, and social connection. The participants described the intervention as providing a sense of purpose, calmness, and motivation. In brief, structured exposure to therapeutic gardening was associated with measurable improvements in mental health-related outcomes among people experiencing homelessness.

conclusionsThe participatory design facilitated both individual and collective benefits, suggesting that such interventions may offer low-cost, scalable pathways for emotional restoration and social inclusion. The findings suggest that nature-based approaches may offer valuable complementary support within homelessness services, with attention to cultural, psychological, and environmental dimensions.

Indexed as

GardeningIll-Housed PersonsAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedPsychological Well-BeingSpainHomelessnessNature-based interventionsSelf-perceived health and well-beingTherapeutic gardening

Identifiers

PMID41975383
PMCPMC13195845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.