ArticleBMC oral health2026
BRAF and RAS mutations in Vietnamese patients with ameloblastoma.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAmeloblastoma is a benign but locally aggressive odontogenic tumor. Genetic mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, particularly those in BRAF and RAS, have been increasingly implicated in its pathogenesis, but remain underreported in Vietnamese patients.
methodsNinety-six formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) ameloblastoma samples from Vietnamese patients were retrospectively analyzed. Targeted exons of BRAF and RAS genes were amplified by PCR and sequenced using Sanger sequencing on an ABI 3500 Genetic Analyzer. Mutation frequencies, the prevalence of the BRAF p.Val600Glu (BRAFV600E), and their associations with clinical, radiographic, and histopathological features were evaluated.
resultsMAPK pathway mutations were identified in 63.5% of cases. BRAFV600E was the most frequent alteration, detected in 52.1% (50/96) of tumors. BRAFV600E mutations were significantly associated with radiographic radiolucent patterns, and were more common in female than in male patients (p < 0.05). In addition, a rare HRAS variant, c.22G > A (p.Val8Met) (HRASV8M), was identified. To our knowledge, this variant has not been previously reported in ameloblastoma or in public mutation databases and is therefore considered a novel, exploratory finding.
conclusionsBRAF and RAS mutations were identified in Vietnamese patients with ameloblastoma, with BRAFV600E mutation accounting for more than half of the cases. The significant association of BRAF p.Val600Glu with distinct radiographic features and female gender supports its potential value as a biomarker. In addition, the identification of a novel HRAS mutation warrants the need for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.