Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975352›Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2026

Statin prescription patterns among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Asmaa Mohamed Abdelaal, Mohamed Ghonem, Yasmin Atwa Mohamed, Ahmad S Hasan, Fady Kyrillos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asmaa Mohamed AbdelaalDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes (Internal medicine department), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohamed GhonemDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes (Internal medicine department), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Yasmin Atwa MohamedDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes (Internal medicine department), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. yasminatwa@mans.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6525-5341
Ahmad S HasanDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Fady KyrillosDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes (Internal medicine department), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) face a significantly elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Among the various risk factors, dyslipidemia is strongly associated with CVD. Statins are the first-line treatment for patients at risk. Their ability to effectively reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels has made them a cornerstone in the prevention and management of CVD.

aimTo assess the pattern of statin prescription in T2D patients and follow its use as a primary and secondary prevention for CVD. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study design was cross-sectional followed by a quasi-experimental pre–post intervention. 210 T2D patients were recruited to evaluate the statin use regarding type, dose, adherence, and reason for use. After reporting the statin use pattern, all patients were subjected to one or more drug interventions: education about the importance of statin use, initiating statin in those who didn’t use it before, changing the statin type and/or dose, adding ezetimibe, and insisting on drug adherence. 3 months later, the statin use pattern was reevaluated to assess the percentage of patients who reached LDL and non high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) targets according to 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines.

results210 T2D patients were recruited in the study with a mean age of 54.63 ± 9.77 years. 67.6% were females, and 49% were at very high CV risk. Only 90 (42.9%) were statin users with 12.2% adherence rate. Atorvastatin was the most prescribed statin. 55.3% (57 out of 103) of patients with a very high CV risk and 48.6% (17 out of 35) of patients with high CV risk were not on statin therapy. High-intensity statins were used by only 28.2% and 31.4% of very high and high CV risk patients, respectively. A few patients achieved the LDL and non-HDL targets on the first visit, even among statin users (6.6% and 7.7%, respectively). Despite the increased percentage of target achievement on second visit, only 64.3% of all included patients achieved LDL target, and 57.6% achieved non-HDL target.

conclusionThe majority of T2D patients were either non-statin or moderate-intensity statin users, despite their high and very high CV risk. High-intensity statins plus ezetimibe cannot always achieve LDL and non-HDL targets. Potential need for additional lipid-lowering therapies should be addressed. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary PreventionSecondary PreventionAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDyslipidemiasFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsCardiovascular riskPrimary preventionSecondary preventionStatins prescriptionT2D

Identifiers

PMID41975352
PMCPMC13078012

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.