ArticleBMC public health2026
Audit on knowledge, attitudes and practices on developmental assessment among public health midwives in a sub-urban health area in Sri Lanka.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAge-appropriate early childhood development is a key determinant of later educational attainment, social functioning, and economic productivity. In Sri Lanka, Public Health Midwives (PHMs) are frontline primary healthcare providers responsible for early childhood care and development (ECCD), including routine developmental assessment (DA). This audit aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practices related to DA among PHMs in a sub-urban Medical Officer of Health (MOH) area in Sri Lanka.
methodsThe audit was conducted among PHMs attached to the Mahara MOH area in the Western Province of Sri Lanka. Audit standards were derived from the ECCD Handbook and national developmental standards for Sri Lankan infants and toddlers issued by the Ministry of Health. A structured, self-administered questionnaire assessed knowledge across multiple developmental domains, attitudes towards routine DA, and self-reported DA practices. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise findings.
resultsOf 54 eligible PHMs, 44 participated (response rate: 81.4 %). All participants agreed that DA should be routinely conducted during service encounters. However, none reported being fully confident in performing a comprehensive DA. The mean overall knowledge score was 63.7% (SD = 8.4). Knowledge was lowest for assessing primary reflexes (mean = 49.8%) and cut-off ages for milestone attainment (mean = 32.9%). While attitudes towards DA were generally favourable, reported routine practice and referral for further developmental evaluation were limited.
conclusionsAlthough PHMs demonstrated acceptable overall knowledge and favourable attitudes towards DA, important gaps were identified in critical areas such as knowledge on milestone cut-off ages, primary reflexes, confidence, and routine practice. Strengthening in-service training, supportive supervision, and referral pathways is essential. A structured capacity-building programme followed by re-audit is recommended to improve early identification and management of developmental delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.