ArticleBMC public health2026
Knowledge and attitudes about stroke among Egyptian adults: results from an online cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Stroke Knowledge and Perceptions Within the Palestinian Community: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Assessing the public understanding of stroke is crucial, as it can improve stroke services and minimize the time between the onset of symptoms and the delivery of thrombolysis and thrombectomy, thereby improving patient outcomes and reducing mortality. This study aimed to assess stroke knowledge among Egyptian adults and identify factors influencing their knowledge.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using an anonymous self-administered Arabic questionnaire distributed via various social media platforms. The survey assessed knowledge about stroke risk factors, symptoms, consequences, and appropriate responses to stroke symptoms.
resultsA total of 4516 participants completed the questionnaire, with 64.3% being females. Most participants were aged 18–29 (82.6%), and those working or studying in the medical field represented 52.9%. Knowledge of stroke risk factors, symptoms, and consequences was prevalent among participants, with 65.9% having a good level of knowledge. Internet and social media platforms were the most common sources of information (56.6%). Having a high level of education, medical field of work, reporting having higher income level, having heard about stroke, a positive family history of stroke, and knowing someone with stroke were all predictors of a good level of stroke knowledge.
conclusionThe study revealed a high level of knowledge among study participants. However, additional efforts are necessary to promote awareness through targeted educational interventions and campaigns, especially among vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.