ArticleBMC public health2026
Access to and self-reported health impacts of COVID-19 prevention measures on people with disabilities in Vietnam: Results from a cross-sectional study in three mega-cities.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19 and measures for its containment have had direct and indirect impacts on people’s health, with certain groups disproportionately impacted. This cross-sectional study in Vietnam assessed self-reported health impacts of COVID-19 related restrictions amongst people with and without disabilities, and their inclusion in response measures.
methodsA cross-sectional survey conducted from December 2021 to January 2022 included 898 participants from Da Nang, Ha Noi, and Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam. Disability status was determined using government disability cards, the Washington Group short set questions, or self-identification. Analysis compared self-reported health impacts (e.g., well-being, access to general and disability related health services) and inclusion in response measures (e.g., access to vaccination, personal protective equipment) between people with and without disabilities using StataSE 17.
resultsPeople with disabilities were much more likely to report negative impacts of COVID-19 restrictions on their well-being (Prevalence Ratio (PR) 1.8, 95% CI 1.5–2.3), and general healthcare access (PR 2.6, 95% CI 1.8–3.8). Despite similar vaccination rates, people with disabilities faced challenges in vaccine information access (PR 4.4, 95% CI 2.5–7.8), appointment scheduling, site accessibility and interactions with staff (PR 11.9, 95% CI 4.8–29.5). They also encountered difficulties adhering to preventive measures, although they were more likely to receive personal protective equipment and hygiene products compared to people without disabilities (PR 2.9, 95% CI 2.0-4.1).
conclusionsPeople with disabilities reported significantly worse well-being and healthcare access and faced greater barriers in accessing vaccination information and services despite similar vaccination coverage. These findings indicate that while high vaccination coverage is achievable, disproportionate structural barriers faced by people with disabilities call for inclusive, targeted strategies in future public health emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.