ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
MicroSSNet: an R package for microbial network construction and analysis at the single-sample and aggregated levels.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNetwork analysis is a fundamental tool for elucidating microbial interactions, which are crucial for understanding the mechanisms that shape ecosystem structure and function. However, aggregated co-abundance/co-occurrence network approaches that infer pairwise relationships among biological entities from large sample collections often overlook sample-specific interaction patterns. To address this limitation, we developed MicroSSNet, an R package designed for analyzing microbial networks, including both aggregated and single-sample networks.
resultsWe designed MicroSSNet primarily to fill the current gap in bioinformatics tools for constructing single-sample networks (SSNs) from microbiome data, and we evaluated both the performance and limitations of ssPCC-based SSNs using simulated and real datasets. Through Monte Carlo simulations, we assessed the statistical behavior of ssPCC and highlighted scenarios in which ssPCC is less powerful. We then applied MicroSSNet to two distinct datasets: a human gut metagenomic dataset and a soil 16S rRNA gene dataset. In the human gut dataset, SSNs revealed unique edges not detected in the aggregated network. In the soil dataset, SSN features showed some predictive value for group classification. However, SSN-derived patterns should be interpreted cautiously, as they may not exclusively reflect true interaction changes. MicroSSNet additionally implements a full aggregated-network workflow, including bipartite networks and extensive topological property analysis.
conclusionsTogether, MicroSSNet offers a framework for constructing and analyzing both single-sample and aggregated microbial networks. In this work, we also highlight the potential and limitations of single-sample network approaches, supporting their application as exploratory tools in microbiome research across individual and population levels. The package is freely available on GitHub ( https://github.com/TangZecheng622/MicroSSNet ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.