ArticleBMC genomics2026
The reference genome of the Asian Elephant (Elephas maximus): a foundation for conservation and genomic research.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Massive Genetic Diversity Loss Within Asian Elephant Subspecies: New Insights for Determining Conservation Priorities.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Population genomic assessment of semi-captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) from Myanmar: endangered species management and conservation implications.BMC genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), a keystone species with both ecological and cultural significance, is highly endangered and has disappeared from 95% of its historical range. In this study, we present a chromosome-level assembly and an annotation of the Asian elephant genome, providing a foundational resource for population genomics, conservation biology and evolutionary research.
resultsThe primary genome assembly spans 190 contigs, with an N50 of 87,987,108 bp and is scaffolded into 64 sequences, with an N50 of 127,432,672 bp. We also present two haplotype-resolved assemblies with contig N50s of 75,101,715 bp and 88,213,608 bp. The genome assemblies and annotated protein-coding models in the primary assembly are highly complete, with 98.2%, 98.2%, and 96.0% BUSCO single-copy orthologs identified in the primary and two haplotype genome assemblies, respectively, and 98.8% recovered in the protein-coding annotation. We showcase how this reference genome enables insights into functional and evolutionary genomics, including the transposable element landscape, demographic history, a comparison against an individual sequenced from another population, as well as an investigation into genomic regions with increased levels of heterozygosity that colocalise with multi-copy gene families associated with immune and sensory-responses.
conclusionThe development of a high-quality genome assembly and annotation for E. maximus gives researchers a valuable resource to help understand the evolutionary history of this iconic species as well as guide conservation efforts. Here we have shown that highly contiguous, complete and accurate chromosome sequences help uncover regions with increased levels of homozygosity, indicative of inbreeding, and areas of increased heterozygosity, enriched for genes key to the immune response and other sensory mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.