ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Predicting the future for neonates with symptomatic congenital heart disease.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDetermine prenatal and neonatal factors that predict infantile outcomes in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). STUDY
designRetrospective cohort of 415 neonates with CHD admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Statistical tests included Chi-square, Fisher's Exact, Kruskal-Wallis, and multivariable logistic regression.
resultsCardiac lesion type was associated with mortality, length of stay, and enteral feeding tube support at discharge (EFTD) (p ≤ 0.01). A genetic diagnosis and an extra-cardiac congenital anomaly were associated with higher odds of respiratory support needs at discharge (RSND) [OR 2.8 (95% CI: 1.2, 6.5); 4.8 (1.9, 11.8)] and EFTD [5.5 (2.9, 10.8); 3.4 (2.4-9.7)]. Lower birth weight was associated with higher odds of RSND [0.5 (0.38, 0.66)], and lower gestational age with higher odds of EFTD [0.84 (0.75, 0.95)].
conclusionSeveral factors predicted adverse outcomes in infants with CHD, helping to identify high-risk cases for targeted care and improved parental guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.