Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975196›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

Multimodal dataset on glucose interpretation, treatment decisions and smartwatch visualisation for type 1 diabetes.

Rujiravee Kongdee, Bijan Parsia, Hood Thabit, Simon Harper

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rujiravee KongdeeDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom. rujiravee.kongdee@manchester.ac.uk.
Bijan ParsiaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
Hood ThabitManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom.
Simon HarperDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) must frequently check their blood glucose and make over 180 health-critical decisions daily alongside everyday life decisions. These individuals heavily rely on glucose monitoring devices to monitor their glucose levels, yet the user interfaces do not support accurate interpretation and treatment decision-making. The constant need to check glucose levels several times a day also contributes to negative emotional impacts, including diabetes distress and burnout, where individuals eventually disengage from self-care. This dataset comprises three complementary components: (1) transcripts capturing how 27 individuals with T1DM interpret and make treatment decisions presented on their familiar monitoring interfaces, (2) questionnaire responses from 86 individuals with T1DM detailing their treatment actions across various glucose scenarios and (3) 11 smartwatch interfaces designed to support ambient, at-a-glance glucose awareness. Together, this dataset provides an in-depth investigation of interpretation errors, decision-making processes, and design opportunities. The dataset can support clinicians in understanding patient reasoning and provides researchers with a foundation for developing glucose interfaces that support better long-term diabetes self-management.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Continuous Glucose MonitoringDecision MakingDigital HealthHumansBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID41975196
PMCPMC13247053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.