ReviewObesity surgery2026
Complexity-Aware Artificial Intelligence in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: Beyond Static Risk Prediction.
Review in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) research in metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS), translation into routine clinical practice remains limited, with only a small minority of published models progressing beyond retrospective evaluation. This narrative review and conceptual framework paper explores why conventional risk prediction approaches (both traditional calculators and first-generation AI models) have shown limited clinical utility in MBS. We argue that a key limitation lies in their treatment of surgical patients as static entities, insufficiently accounting for the dynamic, nonlinear, and adaptive nature of human physiology under surgical stress. MBS represents a particularly illustrative setting, characterized by abrupt metabolic transitions, autonomic recalibration, and complex perioperative physiology. We propose a complexity-aware AI paradigm that emphasizes continuous perioperative data streams, variability- and entropy-based features, temporal modeling, and rigorous prospective validation. Rather than attempting to suppress physiologic variability, future AI systems may achieve greater clinical relevance by leveraging complexity itself as a source of prognostic information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41975141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.