Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975130›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026

Love Is Not Blind: It May Be Indifferent to Partners' Flaws, Unless It Involves Cheating or Aggression.

Marta Kowal, Adam Bode

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marta KowalIDN Being Human Lab, Institute of Psychology, University of Wrocław, Dawida 1, 50-527, Wrocław, Poland. marta7kowal@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9050-1471
Adam BodeSchool of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4593-5179

Funding

University of Wrocław This study was made possible thanks to funds from Institute of PsychologyUniversity of Wrocław University of Wrocław
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A popular saying asserts that love is blind and lovers view each other through rose-tinted glasses. We examined whether lovers recognize their partners' flaws and whether reflecting on these imperfections affects love intensity. We recruited 844 partnered individuals and randomly assigned them to a flaw recognition condition, where they described their partner's shortcomings, or to a passive control condition without such additional tasks. Frequentist comparisons revealed no significant group differences in experiences of intimacy, passion, and commitment, and Bayesian tests provided strong evidence supporting the null hypothesis. However, qualitative analyses showed that participants who reported severe transgressions, particularly infidelity or aggression, reported significantly lower love intensity. These results indicate that although lovers-even in early relationship stages often presumed to be wearing rose-tinted glasses-can typically acknowledge their partners' imperfections without their feelings weakening, love may be undermined once transgressions exceed a critical threshold. These findings can be interpreted within the love as a commitment device perspective, which posits that love serves to maintain bonds even when partners and relationships are imperfect and they also fit evolutionary accounts predicting that transgressions which threaten reproductive success (infidelity) or survival and bodily integrity (aggression) are particularly likely to erode romantic love.

Indexed as

AggressionDeceptionInterpersonal RelationsLoveSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCommitmentIntimacyPassionPositivity biasTriangular Love Scale-15

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.