Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41975129›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Congruency and distance effects vary across simultaneous and sequential two-digit integer, fraction, and decimal 2AFC tasks.

Isabella Starling-Alves, Eric D Wilkey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isabella Starling-AlvesDepartment of Psychology and Human Development (Peabody College), Vanderbilt University, 230 Appleton Place; PMB 552, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4781-2706
Eric D WilkeyDepartment of Psychology and Human Development (Peabody College), Vanderbilt University, 230 Appleton Place; PMB 552, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA. eric.d.wilkey@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3742-0909

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) comparison tasks are widely used to investigate how humans process complex information. However, it is still not fully understood how the format of these tasks influences cognitive strategies. In this study, we analyzed whether 2AFC tasks with simultaneous stimulus presentation provide the same information on how people process information as 2AFC tasks with sequential stimulus presentation. We investigated this question within the number domain. In particular, we investigated how the distance and congruency effects-which are interpreted as behavioral markers of holistic and fragmented number processing-vary across simultaneous and sequential versions of two-digit integer, fraction, and decimal 2AFC tasks. Undergraduate students (n = 162) completed both simultaneous and sequential versions of two-digit integer, fraction, and decimal comparison tasks. Comparison pairs varied in numerical distance (near vs. far) and congruency (congruent vs. incongruent). Across all number types, we observed both distance and congruency effects. However, these effects differed by task format. In particular, a linear mixed model revealed that the congruency effect was stronger in simultaneous tasks with near-distance pairs and weaker in sequential tasks with far-distance pairs. The differences in the strength of the distance and congruency effects across simultaneous and sequential 2AFC task formats indicate that they play a critical role in shaping information processing strategies. Thus, our findings suggest that simultaneous and sequential 2AFC tasks engage distinct cognitive processes and should not be used interchangeably in cognitive research.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorCognitionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult2AFCAlternative forced choiceCongruency effectDistance effectNumberSequential comparisonSimultaneous comparison

Identifiers

PMID41975129
PMCPMC13076428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.